The court below reversed the judgment of the first instance court that found the charged facts of this case guilty on the grounds that there is no proof of crime, and acquitted the defendant.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower judgment did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “a person who received subsidies by false application or other unlawful means” in the crime of deception, causation, and subsidy management in fraud.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.