In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 50,000 won.

Defendant

B is an employee of the E pharmacy in Yongcheon-si D, and the defendant A is a person who operates the above pharmacy.

1. On January 24, 2013, Defendant B, while working as an employee at the above E- pharmacy, was unable to sell drugs without a pharmacist’s license. However, the Defendant sold drugs to F, who purchased the drugs to F, who was classified as a general medicine in the said pharmacy, in 3,500 won by separating one thro-mail (10 caps) and one bro-path, and five bropropy.

2. Defendant A, at the time and place described in the preceding paragraph, committed a violation as described in the preceding paragraph, by Defendant B, who is an employee of the Defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Accusation against a violator of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act;

1. Application of the investigation report (as to the attachment of a copy of the petition), investigation report (as to the CD-cap photographs for evidence submitted by the appellant), investigation report (as to the interview photographs for evidence), and the application of the statutes governing the CD-raising document;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 97, 93 (1) 7, and 44 (1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (Selection of Fines);

(b) Defendant B: Article 93(1)7 and Article 44(1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (Selection of Fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;