However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 14, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc.) (the Defendant: (a) had the victim D, a substitute driver, operate a EB car; (b) had the victim D to use the EB car; and (c) had the victim obtain accurate address from the victim to use the EB apartment located in the southyang-si located in the residence of the Defendant; and (d) in order to obtain accurate address from the victim “I only go ahead, if I do not want to do so, I am again if I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시경 남양주시 G 소재 H파출소 주차장에서 술에 취한 대리운전 손님을 깨워달라는 신고를 받고 출동한 위 파출소 소속 경사 I으로부터 “선생님, 집이 어디세요 ”라는 물음을 받자 “야 씹새끼야, 꺼져버려, 씨발놈 지랄하네, 짭새 잘 났다.”라고 소리친 후 손바닥으로 경사 I의 얼굴을 밀어 제친 후 얼굴을 수회 때려, 공공의 안녕과 질서유지에 관한 경찰 공무원의 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement law to I and D;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes against the Crime under the relevant Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the choice of punishment (to select imprisonment with prison labor in consideration of the fact that the defendant has four times of violence, and among them, a crime has been committed against taxi drivers similar to this case);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The victim D under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution shall be the defendant.