학교설립자명의변경절차이행
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff succeeding intervenor.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court determined that it is impracticable to implement the procedure for changing the name of a person who established an academic background-accredited lifelong educational establishment under
Examining the record, the above recognition and judgment of the court below are justifiable.
There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal principles.
The remaining grounds of appeal are pertaining to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance which rejected the plaintiff's lawsuit among the judgment below, and it is evident that there is no relation to the claim of the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor. Thus, the only plaintiff's succeeding intervenor's appeal is not legitimate
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.