직업능력개발훈련지원금부정수급에 따른 지
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s employees, who were recognized as the workplace skill development training course, applied for subsidies to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea (hereinafter “C”) and received subsidies of KRW 14,022,320 as indicated in the table “subsidies” on the premise that: (a) the Plaintiff’s employees, as indicated in the table below, concluded a contract for workplace skill development training by means of remote training for the number of trainees; and (b) 205 of the “number of trainees” among the above trainees (hereinafter “instant trainees”) completed the instant training normally and completed the instant training, on the premise that the instant training satisfies the standards for completion of distance training subsidies (hereinafter “the standards for completion”) and received subsidies of KRW 14,02,320 as indicated in the table.
On April 8, 2014, the date of the payment date of training expenses for the number of trainees completed during the course name * The number of trainees is the amount as of April 28, 2014 when the payment date of training expenses is made. From April 28, 2014 to June 30, 2014, June 30, 2014; 7,056,000 August 5, 2014; 936,000; 2.26 October 26, 2015; 200 on October 26, 2015; 8,216; 108; 204; 205,436,436,46,405; 208.
B. On July 26, 2017, the Defendant issued 360 days (360 days from July 26, 2017 to July 2018) pursuant to Article 55(2) of the former Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (amended by Act No. 13902, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter “Vocational Skills Development Act”), Article 22 and attached Table 6-2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Vocational Skills Development Act, on the ground that “this case’s trainee did not undergo the instant training and did not meet the completion standard, and the Plaintiff applied for subsidies to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea.”