However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant: (a) was a person operating “C”, which is a manufacturer and processing company of rice tea, and an incorporated farming association, in the following cities: (b) the Defendant conspired to obtain subsidies by falsely pretending to the details of payment of self-paid charges, which are essential conditions for granting subsidies, by using subsidies for agricultural management consulting projects by a local government, together with F, the representative of the (ju) E established for the purpose of agricultural management consulting in Gwangju Northern-gu D; and (c) the Defendant, a subsidized business operator (agricultural association, farmer, etc.) by using subsidies for agricultural management consulting projects by a local government

On the other hand, the agricultural management consulting support project is a national subsidy program for the agricultural management business entity that is implemented as part of the agricultural management support project, the agricultural management business entity that wishes to receive subsidies after the implementation of the project, and 50% of the project cost is borne by itself and the remainder of 50% is claimed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 15,00,000 won in cash from employees in the foregoing “C” office at around April 2016, and remitted the above KRW 15,000,000 to the account under the name of the E as if they were their own shares, and around that time, attached the deposit details of false shares in the above manipulation in the application for subsidies to the said employee, thereby allowing the said F to submit the said application for subsidies to the said employee at the time of benefitingting the victim’s interest.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above F, by deceiving the victim as above, and let F receive the total of KRW 15,00,000 from the victim around September 5, 2016 and December 23, 2016, the Defendant acquired the above Support Project subsidies from F, and thereby, received them. From around that time to December 17, 2018, the Defendant subsidies agricultural management consulting services from the victim six times, such as the statement in the “Crimes List.”