The defendant is related to the victim C and was an employee of the president of the relevant business entity, who is employed by the victim as an employee.

D Adump truck number plate in the name of the business entity has been accused of the problem.

Although the defendant, who was aware of D, attempted to contact the victim to discuss this problem with the victim, the victim was faced with the victim on the ground that the victim was avoiding contact.

Accordingly, using the Defendant’s mobile phone SNS Stockholm, the victim around December 13, 2016, by using the Defendant’s cell phone phone SNS “Neng - D” around 11:14.

C 10 Doese franc franc franc franc francs

Nituda Roster omer omera shall not speak

” 라는 내용의 메시지를 전송하고, 계속하여 같은 방법으로 피해자에게 2016. 12. 16. 19:48 경 “ 잘 사는 사람 이혼시키고 D 씨랑 산다고 말했나!!!

내가 니에 대해서 내가 아는 거 잊었나!!

해보자 내가 어떻게 하는지”, 같은 날 20:12 경 “ 니가 미쳐도 단단히 미 첬 네 ㅠ”, 같은 날 20:13 경 “ 내가 어떻게 살았는지 누구보다 잘 알면서”, 2016. 12. 29. 12:55 경 “ 니 내전화 안받으면, 너 거 신랑 만나서 니 남자관계 다 말할 테니깐 전화해 라”, 같은 날 18:48 경 “ 너 거 신랑 만나기로 했다” 는 내용 등의 메시지를 전송하여 마치 피해자의 배우자에게 피해자의 남자관계에 관하여 좋지 않은 말을 전할 것처럼 행세하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant repeatedly reached the victim with the language that arouses fear or apprehension through the information and communications network.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Kakao Stockholm message legislation

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, the relevant Article of the Act and Articles 74-7 (1) 3 (Selection of Penalty) of the same Act;

1. The fine to be suspended 1,00.