The Defendant incurred approximately KRW 50,00,000 from around 2013 to a loan company, etc., and sold KRW 92,00,000 to the Defendant’s wife C and the Internet Nene “China” car page in the “10,000 fake gift certificates”.

The purpose of this article is to obtain money by means of so-called “return prevention” that is sent to the existing applicant by posting a letter of “”, and to receive merchandise coupons for persons reporting and communicating, and preferentially repay their debts, and purchase merchandise coupons with the price for merchandise coupons delivered by other people, and send it to the existing applicant for purchase.

The network C is a victim D, who reported and contacted the above notice on March 2014 after the Defendant and the mother of the Defendant, “A company accompanying her husband, receives merchandise coupons as the price to deliver the goods to the department stores, etc., and distributes them at a price lower than the actual merchandise coupon market price.

In the first half of the year of 2015, the transaction began by means of a false statement that received the payment of merchandise coupons from the injured party, and after receiving the money from the injured party as the purchase price of merchandise coupons without the actual transaction of merchandise coupons, the transaction continued by means of selling the merchandise coupons and giving only the money in the name of the profits as if the profit was paid.

During that period, the Defendant and the Defendant and the Dong C, as seen above, used the merchandise coupon price deposited by the applicants for the purchase of merchandise coupons as living expenses and the Defendant’s illegal sports soil and entertainment expenses, thereby increasing the debt. On March 14, 2016, the Defendant and the Dong C, who called the victim by the Dong C, should adjust the amount before the husband transferred the old account to the next buyer.

As a long-term trading benefits to the victim, the husband made a false statement to the effect that he/she purchased ice before her husband retires.

However, the defendant supplied goods to department stores, etc. at the time, did not receive merchandise coupons in return, and received merchandise coupons from the injured party.