However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 8, 2015, the Defendant informed the Defendant’s account number from his name in his name, and listened to the statement that he would give consideration to the Defendant by withdrawing the money deposited in the account and allowing him to pay the money. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant sent another name in his name in the vicinity of the water station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 338, and notified the Defendant of the account number (C) of the national bank account number in his name.

On April 8, 2015, the act of the above person without his name was called to the victim D on April 10, 2015, and was examined by the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office (Seoul District Public Prosecutor's Office).

D Whether there is an attempt to make a loan to the Agricultural Cooperative established in the name of C and the Han Bank passbook.

The same shall apply to stolen names.

Around 11:48 of the same day, the victim transferred KRW 32,300,000 from the SBI Savings Account in the name of the victim to the company bank account (E) in the name of the victim, and subsequently, the above victim changed the number of the company bank's OTP card to the above company bank account, and then arbitrarily transferred KRW 32,30,000 from the company bank account in the name of the defendant to the company bank account in the name of the victim in the name of the victim.

On April 8, 2015, the Defendant requested the withdrawal of money deposited in the national bank account under the name of the Defendant from a person who was unable to know his/her name in the river basin, and withdrawn KRW 32 million from the counter of the branch office North Korea of the National Bank, which was located in the 391, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and then delivered it to the person who was waiting for the above bank along with the above bank.

Accordingly, the defendant was able to facilitate the act of deceiving 32,300,000 won from the injured party by the above-mentioned scambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A copy of bankbook;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the exit of a branch office north of the Korean Bank;

1. Criminal facts;