However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 모욕 피고인은 2014. 5. 18. 03:00경 서울 강북구 C에 있는 D 운영의 ‘E’ 주점 앞 노상에서, 술에 취하여 잠을 자던 중 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울강북경찰서 F파출소 소속 피해자인 경사 G이 피고인을 깨워 귀가하라고 권유하자, 위 D과 성명불상의 행인들이 듣는 가운데 피해자에게 “씨발놈아, 짭새 새끼야. 좆 같은 새끼야, 내가 짭새라고 해서 꼽나 ”라는 등 욕설하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 전항과 같은 일시, 장소에서, 위와 같이 위 경사 G에게 욕설하여 위 G이 ‘모욕죄로 처벌받을 수 있으니 그만하고 귀가하라’고 하자 G에게 다가가 “어떻게 할 건데, 짭새새끼야!”라고 하면서 머리로 G의 얼굴 부위를 1회 들이받고, 주먹을 휘두르는 등 폭행하여 경찰공무원의 범죄예방, 수사 및 질서유지 등에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on investigation (the details of the suspect's conduct of investigation);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including favorable circumstances, etc. among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. In the case of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by recommendation type, the sentencing criteria are set at the lower limit of the sentencing criteria for the crime of insult and six months to four months to four months to the basic area of category 1, and the lower limit of the sentencing criteria is set at the lower limit of the sentencing range.

2. The sentence of this case is not good, and there are criminal records of the same kind to the defendant, but the defendant is against the defendant, and the degree of violence is not relatively much severe.