However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated in the process of preparing a written statement of a assault case that occurred before the Ulsan-gun Police Station C police box located in Ulsan-gun B; (b) stated that D’s personal information and punishment related to D’s assault case that occurred on February 13, 2014; and (c) stated in the written statement that “the Defendant shall not be punished for the assault case that occurred on February 13, 2014,” which was kept there without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her authority, using an examination and painting to the form of a written statement that was kept there; and (d) signed by the above D’s name and used it as a document that actually constituted the forged written statement to the judicial police assistant E, who is aware of the forgery.

2. At around 20:51 on March 7, 2014, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant had F, without authority, enter the identity of D in the protocol of interrogation of the accused as if he was D, and had F, without authority, enter the identity of D in the protocol of interrogation of the accused as if he was D, and forged the signature of D with the seal affixed, and thereafter had F, who was aware of the forgery at the same place, bound F to file the above protocol of interrogation of the accused in the investigation records.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (Submission, etc. after preparing a statement);

1. A written statement prepared in the name D;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol prepared in the name D;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act and Articles 231, 234, 231 of the same Act, Article 239 (1) of the same Act, Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the same Act, which apply to the crime;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.