However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2015 Highest 2860] On June 30, 2014, the Defendant sent to the victim E at the D 1st floor coffee store located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, “The H beam 7,00 tons of domestic Hn beam 7,00 tons per ton of goods is consigned to the victim E from among the stock companies kept in the Incheon Songdo F Bond warehouse. However, the Defendant deposited the goods at KRW 390,000,000,000 per ton, while the down payment is deposited in the down payment.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant received 30 million won down payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the sn beam to the victim.

On August 1, 2014, the Defendant received 30 million won from the damaged party to the post office account (H) in the name of the Defendant and acquired it by defrauded.

[2015 Highest 3440]

1. Around January 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim I at the construction site of the Han-dong apartment redevelopment apartment located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to the effect that “The Defendant would make a removal of the apartment redevelopment apartment of Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.”

However, the defendant could not give a definite order for the removal construction to the victim, and it was thought that the defendant received money from the victim to use it for living expenses and expenses for other construction sites.

On January 26, 2010, 200,000,000 won, from the victim to the account under the J’s name, and the same year.

2.4.4.10 million won was remitted and acquired by fraud.

2. On February 4, 2010, the Defendant would give the victim the scrap metal coming from the removal of the Saemaul redevelopment area located in the Geum-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-ri to the victim in the “L” operated by the victim I located in the Sinju-si.

A false statement was made that "The advertising expenses should be paid as the construction deposit and the newspaper advertisement for the bidding of the removal company."

However, the defendant did not have been finally determined whether to supply scrap metal to the victim by implementing the removal construction, and it was thought that money was given from the victim to be used for living expenses and for other construction sites.