B Imprisonment of 17 years, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 6 years, Defendant D, F, and H respectively, and Defendant E.

I. All Facts

1. Defendant B’s position as the Defendants and co-offenders was changed from AS Co., Ltd. (ATS to August 1, 2013). The following arguments by the Defendants and defense attorneys are referred to as AS Co., Ltd. except for the judgment II.1. Meanwhile, the head of the system business headquarters of the corporation and the limited liability company from the time when the second names the corporation and the limited liability company are omitted to indicate the “stock company” and “limited liability company”).

AU is the representative director of AV, a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling telecommunications equipment.

Defendant

C is a company director (representative) of AW established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling electronic equipment.

Defendant

D is an internal director (representative) of a corporation AX established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling telecommunications equipment.

Defendant

E is a representative director of AY corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing communications equipment, ancillary equipment, etc.

Defendant

F is the representative director of AZ established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling telecommunications devices-related parts.

Defendant

G is the representative director of the corporation BA established for the purpose of the manufacture and sale of mobile phone-related devices.

Defendant

H is the actual operator of BB, a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and wholesale and retailing mobile phones, and the defendant A is the representative director of BB.

Defendant

I is a director of AV and a shareholder of AX and an actual operator of BC limited liability company, BD limited liability company, BE limited liability company, and BE limited liability company established for the purpose of arranging and brokering the purchase of bonds.

2. The relationship between the Defendants and accomplices is a cooperative company that will deliver telecommunications equipment, mobile printer, mobile phone charging device, etc. to AS and a person who will select goods to be supplied and take charge of the delivery and settlement of the price.

AU, the defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, and A are the representatives of the above collaborative enterprises that deliver mobile phone malicious services to AS or actually.