[2015 Highest 173] On October 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) lent the four names to the victim E and made the victim open only one cell phone; (b) paid the cost of installing the cell phone and the telecommunication fee in the city; and (c) transferred the cell phone under the name of the victim E after three months.

“The phrase was made.”

However, around the above time, the Defendant was in a situation where it was impossible to move his mobile phone under his own name because of infinite communication costs of 5,000,000 won due to bad credit standing, and even if the Defendant borrowed the victim’s name and purchased the mobile phone and opened the telecommunications service, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the end-time installment and the telecommunications fee normally.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received the name of the victim from the victim, purchased the LGU radiophone in the name of the victim, and took property benefits equivalent to KRW 1,023,730, including the sum of KRW 869,260, and the call fee of KRW 154,470, and KRW 1,023,730, by using the mobile phone service through the LGU radiocommunication.

[2016 order 218]

1. On July 2, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document by entering his/her application form for a discount program in the “H” mobile phone store located in Seocheon-si G as “I”, “J”, and “I” in the customer name column in the resident registration number column, and signing his/her signature in the applicant column, and forging one copy of the application form for a mobile phone subscription in the name of “I”, “I”, and “J” in the name of the victims, and signing in the name of the victims from June 17, 2015.