beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.05 2014가합106565

부당이득금

Text

1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 21, 1990, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to jointly construct a new building to operate a leasing business. On September 21, 1990, the Plaintiff and the Defendant purchased a 1/2 share of 3rd and 295 square meters in the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government joint business establishment, and completed business registration on September 11, 1990, newly constructed a 5th and completed registration of preservation of ownership on June 18, 191 by constructing a 1/2 share of the 1991.2) Under the said business agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant jointly purchased a 1/2 share of the 420 square meters in the Seoul Mapo-gu E-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government joint business establishment on May 9, 1991, and newly constructed a 3rd and 7rd and 196th share in the said land. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 13358, Jan. 28, 1994>

3) On September 7, 1999, the Plaintiff and the Defendant sold all equity interests in the F building and its site to G, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 20, 1999. (B) The Plaintiff and the Defendant newly constructed D building and the F building management status1), as seen above, shared or borrowed funds, etc. to the Plaintiff and the Defendant shared and borrowed the construction of the D building and F building. The Plaintiff prepared a detailed statement concerning the construction of the F building and the payment of interest on the loan, etc. by October 198, and issued it to the Defendant. In selling F building on September 199, 199, the Plaintiff prepared a detailed statement that adjusted all kinds of expenses from the sale price of the F building and delivered it to the Defendant.

The plaintiff and the defendant did not have money transactions after the sale and settlement of the F building.

2. The plaintiff and the defendant have affixed their seals to the manager of the D building and used them for the conclusion of the lease contract. Since the sale of F building, the plaintiff did not participate in the management of the D building at all, and the defendant had a building manager and made a lease contract using the seals assigned by the plaintiff.