2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the grounds for appeal, in particular, K’s legal statement at the lower court, investigation report (to submit the original copy of the K application contract), and written appraisal result, the Defendant prepared a new service contract under the name of E at around 11:00 on February 21, 201 at the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D D D store where K works without any authority, and entered E and L resident registration numbers in the new contract in the new contract, and submitted and used the new service contract prepared as above, and the Defendant was sufficiently recognized that he obtained the mobile phone from K and obtained the mobile phone from K on February 23, 201. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.