beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.12.04 2013노2349

상해

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant did not inflict any injury upon the victim when making the victim's hand, and the victim took the defendant's hand and took the victim's face when the victim takes his hand, etc.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant, from the investigative agency to the court of the trial, did not have the victim’s time, and the instant injury was changed from the victim’s hand to the victim’s face to the victim’s face, etc. On the other hand, the victim, who did not dispute with the Defendant from the investigative agency to the court of the trial, was unilaterally faced with the face of the victim by drinking from the Defendant, and only during that process, stated that he was able to prevent the Defendant from drinking.

B. The following circumstances are revealed by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, i.e., the injury suffered by the victim: (i) the injury of the victim is an injury caused by alkinal cerebral alkin, alkinal alkinal al part, the left-hand alkinal part, the damage to the left-hand alkinal part; (ii) the damage to the alkinal part is an alkinal part of the upper left-hand al part and the right-hand alkinal part; and (iii) the injury of the victim was caused by the victim's self-harm as stated by the defendant's alkinal part; (ii) the defendant's own price of the victim's face by the defendant's hand. However, the defendant's body was above alkinal part of the defendant's body and without drinking al part, and it seems possible that the victim's face of the defendant's body could be purchased by the witness.