However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant posted a notice stating that “Aphone X mobile phone is to be sold” on the C website, despite the absence of intention or ability to sell a mobile phone due to the absence of a mobile phone.

1. On May 4, 2018, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement that he/she would sell a mobile phone to the victim B who reported and contacted the above writing, and he/she received 855,000 won from the victim as the price for the goods.

2. On May 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement that he/she would sell a mobile phone to the victim D who reported and contacted the above writing; and (b) received 850,000 won from the victim as the price for goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written petition filed by B and D;

1. Transfer certificate and specification of transactions;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on text messages;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Articles 25(1), 31(1), 31(2), and 31(3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Orders for Compensation and Declaration of Provisional Execution; and the age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the various sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the order.

- There is no effort to recover damage that has been sentenced to a fine on several occasions for the same offence / Of the trials, that the escape - reflectment / the amount of damage is not greater / suspension of qualifications or more criminal records.