beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.04.14 2015가단24017

부당이득금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,806,908 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 21, 2015 to April 14, 2016.

Reasons

1. According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, 10 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 3 and 4, the following facts may be acknowledged. Some entries in Gap evidence Nos. 8-7 through 10 shall not interfere with the above recognition, and there shall be no counter-proof.

On October 30, 2014, at around 11:45, the Defendant driven the B-wheeled Vehicle (hereinafter “the instant B-wheeled Vehicle”) and changed the course to one lane in front of the D-Bad Vehicle in the D-Bad Vehicle in the official city in the official city, along the two-lanes, from the distance of the new official, toward the beginning of the new month, toward the beginning of the new month, and changed to the one-lane during the two-lanes, and followed the F-car driven by E driving at a speed of about 50 kilometers per hour according to one lane in the same direction (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”). The Defendant shocked the part of the right side of the instant B-Bad Vehicle into the left side of the instant vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). The details of the instant accident are as follows.

1) At the time of the instant traffic accident, when the signal, etc. was changed from the accident place to a straight-line signal, about 50 minutes, the G Driving turned into two lanes, and the instant car of E Driving was turned into two lanes. The Defendant driven the instant two-wheeled vehicle to a two-lane crossing. The Defendant changed the two-lanes from three-lanes to two-lanes after driving the instant two-lane vehicle to the right edge of the said vehicle. G proceeding with the two-lanes, the two-lanes of the said two-lane vehicle, followed the said two-lane vehicle, followed the two-lane vehicle, sent a warning, and avoided the said two-lane vehicle. However, the Defendant changed the course from two-lanes to one-lane, and the instant two-lanes of the instant vehicle’s body and the instant two-lanes of the present vehicle’s body and the Defendant’s body followed.

B. Due to the instant traffic accident, the instant car amounting to KRW 811,259 is to be the repair cost.