Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On September 17, 2016, at around 16:00, the Defendant opened a door to the victim C (45 tax) in front of the building 307, Suwon-gu, Busan, Busan, and opened a door to the victim C (45 tax). However, on the ground that the victim does not open a door, the Defendant damaged the unclaimed property of the city by breaking the entrance door several times on the ground that the victim does not open a door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (such as attaching photographs of damaged doors);

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 366 of the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. On September 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 18:32 on September 17, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is within the 295 mine-ro 22-o, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., and (b) the Victim C with “after the completion of this

"In the process of being raised, it threatened women."

2. The case is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged on January 11, 2017 that he/she had withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant. Thus, this part of the prosecution against the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.