A. The Plaintiff is the owner and resident of Daegu E-Ba (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Ba”), and the Defendant is the owner of the instant Bara.

B. The waterproof floor floor of the bathing room in the instant Ba G was destroyed, and water leakage was generated from the gap between the lower slab bars and pipes of the three gate, and from the connection part of the water pipe for the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic

(hereinafter “instant number”). 【No dispute exists, entry of evidence A Nos. 1 and 2, appraiser H’s appraisal result, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. According to the facts of recognition as above, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to water leakage in this case as the owner of the loan in this case.

3. Scope of damages.

A. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the construction cost of the indoor bath room and the drum room connections was paid KRW 1,800,000 to the construction cost of the indoor bath room and the drum room connections due to the water leakage in the instant case, and that the Defendant is obliged to pay KRW 1,80,000 to the Plaintiff and the delay damages therefrom.

According to the appraiser H's appraisal result, it is recognized that the number of water leakage in this case requires KRW 1,050,162 to repair defects that occurred in the bathing room in the inside room of the instant Ba and the smoke room connection. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the costs exceeding the above KRW 1,050,162 to repair the above defects. The plaintiff's assertion in this part is with merit within the scope of the above recognition, since there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

B. According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 6, and 8, it is recognized that the plaintiff paid 300,000 won to I on August 31, 2017 as the water leakage inspection cost of the loan of this case F.

(c) attached stuffs;