beta
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2019.11.20 2018가단61823

용역비

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) was the executor of the 1st underground floor, 6 to 7th underground floor, and the 3 aggregate buildings of the 6 to 7th underground floor (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) on July 14, 2014, on which all separate stores in the instant building were entirely acquired.

B. On April 25, 2014, the Plaintiff was appointed as the Director of the Management Office from C and was in charge of the management of the instant building.

C. As to the instant building, the real estate auction auction (hereinafter “instant auction”) was conducted as Seogu District Court Seo-gu Branch E, and school juristic persons F, etc. acquired ownership on October 11, 2016 at the auction of each sectional stores of the instant building.

The defendant is a non-corporate body established for the purpose of managing the building of this case by consisting of sectional owners of the building of this case.

E. On March 16, 2017, the Defendant decided to elect the manager of the building B as a result of the management body meeting on March 14, 2017 and to employ the management staff of the building B.

The management office of the building B shall request the suspension of possession of the building B(C), the management office of the management staff, and other business facilities, which have been continued until now.

On March 24, 2017, the Plaintiff notified that “I request the suspension of business from March 27, 2017.” The Defendant did not succeed to the employment of the head of (Gu)B building management office and employees who illegally possess the facility. At present, the occupation of the main management office is illegal possession without authority, and it interferes with the repair of the facilities, affairs, etc. of the principal who is the legitimate holder of the right through illegal possession. In addition, on March 27, 2017, the Plaintiff notified the following (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant notifications”).

The defendant.