However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Even if the Defendants received money from others as real estate investment names, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to invest in real estate and did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if they borrow money.

On August 3, 2009, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that “When investing in the purchase of dry field located in Seoul-gun I, the Defendants would sell the dry field within six months to the victim H at a restaurant located in the Jeonsung-Gun G.”

The Defendants received 17.5 million won from the victim as a passbook in the name of J on the same day under the pretext of real estate investment money, and 2.5 million won from the victim to the passbook in the name of Defendant A around August 4, 2009.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

2. On August 11, 2009, Defendant A purchased real estate with invested money from the “Khop House in Gwangju Northern-gu” and made a false statement.

However, there was no real estate purchase from the victim.

The defendant was given 50,000 won from the victim's seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness L;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. The protocol of prosecutorial statement concerning H;

1. Protocol of the police interrogation of the defendant A, and protocol of the police statement concerning the defendant B;

1. Certified copy of the register, details of account transaction (1st page of investigation record), details of passbook transaction (1st page of investigation record), details of passbook transaction (1st page of investigation record 150st page), certificate of confirmation (2nd page 7st of investigation record), details of transactions (2nd page 9 of investigation record);

1. The defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion against the defendant B and the defense counsel regarding the investigation report (1 right 1 to investigation records), judgment (1 to 167 pages), and the defendant B and the defense counsel are the victims.