However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B Montreal.

1. On February 6, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused before the risk) driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.131% from blood around 20:00, and the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is driving the said vehicle at the speed of the time between five lanes, namely, the distance between 0.131 and 00.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult under the influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to prevent an accident by safely driving a motor vehicle, such as taking the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of operation

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.131% in a state where normal driving is difficult due to negligence, and led the victim 1) D(22) Do (22) to drive the motor vehicle behind the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in case of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in which the victim F (W, 43 years old and the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) by such occupational negligence, injured the victim 1); (b) injured the catum finites, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to D; (c) injured the catum finites, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment to J (22C) (22 ; (d) injured the victim 3); (c) injured the catum finites, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to K (22 years of age); (d) injured the victim, who is the driver of the damaged vehicle, 4) injured the catum finites, etc., requiring approximately three weeks of treatment to F; and (e) injured the same vehicle.