However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From April 30, 2012 to May 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) installed 30 game equipment of “sea gate,” which is a speculative electronic recreation device, in the mutual influent game room on the fourth floor of the Daegu-gu B building, at the 4th floor of the building; and (b) had customers put 10,00 won into the game machine in the cover of the game machine; and (c) began to put the game machine into the cover of 10,000 won in the cover of the game machine; and (d) caused customers to play the game in such a way as to take points or lose according to the arrangement of the picture or number displayed on the screen of the game machine.

In addition, customers calculated 5,00 won per point on the points they acquired in the game machine and exchanged the points.

Accordingly, the defendant, using speculative gaming machines, was engaged in the business of giving financial benefits or losses to the users according to the results of chance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (field situations, etc.);

1. Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. by which punishment is imposed on the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation;