2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 10, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on March 10, 2008, and on February 28, 201, the Busan District Court issued a summary order of 3 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

Criminal facts

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the vehicle B in Ireland.

1. On September 27, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.118% from the parking site of the Sugugumb Bed, located in the territory of the Busan Shipping Daegu, Busan, to the subordinate underground vehicular road located in the Sejong, Daegu, Busan, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 200 meters from the area of approximately 200 meters to the Sejong, Daegu, the 200 meters.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.118% on September 27, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.118% on blood level, and driven the two-lane road of the underground vehicular road near the Sejong metropolitan traffic Daegu at the port of Busan Metropolitan City, along the two-lane road near the Sejong Metropolitan City, in the direction of the tower located in the Busan Metropolitan City, the two-lane road was driven at a speed of the U.S. 4 East apartment at a speed of the U.S. in accordance with one-lane.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as making it possible to see whether the motor vehicle is fixed, maintaining the safety distance, reducing the speed in advance, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped on the same lane as the previous one due to negligence.

C was driven by C as the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle. The rear part of the Ccus vehicle was received in front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E (the 47 years old), who is a passenger of the Kusa car, due to the foregoing occupational negligence, for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;