When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On July 26, 2016, around 20:50, the Defendant reported an advertisement posted in the “D” 1409 of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 1409, and sought KRW 1.50,000 from E, and engaged in sexual intercourse with it.

2. On August 31, 2016, around 21:18, the Defendant reported an advertisement posted in “G” 320 of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ftel 320, and sought KRW 1.50,000 from H, and engaged in sexual intercourse with the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. A written examination of suspect in relation to E or C by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H with respect to the police;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 21 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the defendant had been under a disposition of suspension of indictment due to the same kind of crime, has committed the instant crime, and the fact that the defendant has ceased to exist on July 26, 2016 and has prevented another person from committing sexual traffic again without going through sexual traffic even though he/she was under the control on July 26, 2016, is disadvantageous circumstances. The fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and that he/she is against himself/herself,