2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition, such as the fact that the defendant divided his mistake into two parts, and that the defendant suffered from poor health conditions, such as urology and liver infection. However, the crime of injury in this case unilaterally assaults the victim E and inflicted an injury upon the above victim for about 14 weeks, which requires medical treatment. In light of the method of crime and the degree of damage, the defendant has a record of having been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, etc., the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims until the trial of the court, and the defendant did not appear during the trial of the court of the court, and the execution of detention warrant issued by the court of the court was conducted. In addition, considering the motive and background leading up to the crime in this case, the defendant's motive and background leading up to the crime in this case, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, etc. after the crime in this case, the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.