2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and opposed to the determination, and that the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment on September 27, 2012 due to the crime of interference with business, etc., and that the judgment became final and conclusive on October 5, 2012, etc. ought to be considered in favor of the Defendant.

However, considering the fact that the defendant repeatedly commits a crime similar to the crime of this case despite the continued punishment of the defendant, and other circumstances revealed in the records and arguments, such as character and conduct of the defendant, the environment, the background of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.