However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 19, 2013, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Goldo vehicle, and around 06:10 on August 19, 2013, the Defendant turned down three-lanes in the direction of the bicycle race from the direction of the ridge distance.

Since the location is where the vehicle signal apparatus is installed on the front side, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused injury to the victim, such as a mouth 7, which requires treatment for about 6 months in the front part of the franchise, which was driven by the victim H(the age of 45) of the I 2 cargo driven by the victim H (the age of 45) who carried a straight line in the right side from the left side of the passenger vehicle of the Ma Ma Ma Ma Mae Mae Mae Mae Mae Mae Mae Mae Mae Mae Mae Ma, in violation of the signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A H statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to survey reports on actual conditions, reports on occurrence of traffic accidents, accident sites, and vehicle photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination is based on the following factors: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence: (a) the Defendant reflects the reason for sentencing; (b) the victim’s damage is covered by a comprehensive insurance; (c) the victim does not wish to be punished; and (d) the Defendant has been sentenced four times of a fine for the same kind of crime. It is so decided