2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is the child of the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) who is the former owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant real estate”). The Defendant is the spouse of the deceased.

B. On June 18, 2013, the Deceased donated the instant real estate to the Defendant and the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of the Defendant on July 15, 2013.

(hereinafter “instant gift contract”). C.

On July 16, 2013, the deceased died. The deceased’s heir is a child between the non-party D, E, F, and the deceased and the non-party G (hereinafter “the deceased”) who is the spouse, and between the deceased and the Defendant. The deceased, H, I, etc. are children.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) In the first place, the deceased was hospitalized in the middle patient room from the date of the instant donation contract to the date of completion of the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant, and thus, it was impossible to indicate the contract and the applicant’s intention for registration. The Defendant’s registration of transfer of ownership is null and void as it is the cause of completing the registration of ownership transfer by preparing at will the donation contract in the name of the deceased and completing the registration of ownership transfer, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to perform the registration procedure for ownership transfer of 2/15 shares equivalent to the Plaintiff’s shares in inheritance among the instant real estate. 2) Preliminaryly, even if the instant donation contract is valid, the Defendant violated the Plaintiff’s legal reserve of inheritance, and thus, the Defendant is obliged to perform the registration procedure for ownership transfer based on legal reserve of inheritance as to the portion of 1/15 shares in the Plaintiff’s

B. We examine the determination of the primary claim for the judgment, and described in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, respectively.