For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court found that there was no proof of crime as to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (measures after the accident) and the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes against Victims F, and determined that the Defendant was acquitted or dismissed on the ground of its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and a crime of violating the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.