부당해고및노동행위구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable, even if the Plaintiff’s appeal is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, and all evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial are examined. Thus, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable. Accordingly, the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.