전자금융거래법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
No one shall lend any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising to receive compensation in using and managing the access medium.
Nevertheless, on January 2, 2018, the Defendant agreed to receive a total of three million won per account from a person who is unable to know the name of "B" in front of an apartment complex of the main factory complex of 7-164-11 at the time of 18:00 on January 2, 2018, in the amount of KRW 1,00,000,000, from a person who is not aware of the name of "B", to receive a total of 3,000,000 won per account for each of the three days in the account of the Defendant’s name (Account Number: C), the Suhyup Bank Deposit Account (Account Number:D), and the one bank Deposit Account (Account Number: E) and sent three physical cards, which are each access media connected to the Kwikset, through a telephone.
Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay for the damages and lent the approaching media.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A statement prepared by the F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on inquiry into transactions, provision of financial transaction information, content of message, and receipt of A text;
1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;
1. The crime of lending an access medium under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the custody of the workhouses is a means to facilitate other crimes committed against many unspecified persons, such as Bosing, etc. The fact that the physical card offered by the Defendant was actually used for the crime of Bosing, which actually iced the loan, and that the Defendant reflects the wrongness of the Defendant.