도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On October 5, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court, and a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime at the same court on February 2, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Brane car.
On May 31, 2020, the Defendant driven the above car on May 11:13, 2020, and proceeded four lanes in front of the large three streets 519-4 as the reunification of Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu along the two lanes in Seoul. The Defendant changed the three lanes to the three lanes.
In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes while living well with the driver of the vehicle, and by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes of the surrounding vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and failed to accurately operate the steering gear and brakes, which led to the failure of the defendant to operate the steering gear and brakes in the front section of the defendant's vehicle, the part on the left back part of the Dphos car driven by the victim C (Nam, 52 years old) was shocked by the defendant's driving.
Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, destroyed the victim’s car to be in excess of KRW 479,380 for repair costs, but did not immediately stop and take necessary measures and escaped from the scene.
2. On May 31, 2020, the Defendant driven a fluor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately KRW 0.150% of blood alcohol concentration on the section of about 6km, from the front of the F-ro in Soyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Yangyang-si to the place of accident described in paragraph (1) after passing through the place of accident described in paragraph (1) from the front of the F-ro in Goyang-gu E, Yangyang-gu to the road front of the opening ecological bridge.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1...