A. K’s establishment and operation of the Defendants 1) K since 1993, K is Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”).

Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant G”), which is its representative director and is its affiliate company

Defendant H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant H”) from February 27, 2001

As from September 14, 1999, Defendant I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant I”)

Defendant J Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant J”) from November 6, 2001 to November 6, 2001.

(2) From January 4, 1999, the Defendants (excluding Defendant F) did not have human resources or assets that can be viewed as a separate company from Defendant F, while holding the position of each representative director or director concurrently and have overall control over the Defendants’ duties.

Defendant F’s employees did not distinguish the remaining Defendants’ work from Defendant F’s work under K’s direction, and did not distinguish the case’s event, but did not distinguish the case’s event from multiple persons with respect to the real estate development project in the area of nine places nationwide (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant development project”).

The above investment was introduced without distinction between Defendant F and affiliate companies, and all of its management was in charge of Defendant F’s management department, and K arbitrarily traded funds between affiliates without undergoing appropriate procedures, such as resolution by the board of directors.

1 F L tourist destination N tourist destination 2 G OOTPPPPP 3 H R district 4 I S resort site 5 JP resort site 5

B. The Plaintiffs’ investment 1) The Plaintiffs’ investment contracts related to the instant development project (hereinafter collectively referred to as “investment contracts”) between Defendant F and Defendant F, as indicated in the separate sheet of compensation for damages.

and each payment shall be made, as seen after the date of payment of the same Table, to Defendant F.