2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On December 1, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of Chinese nationality, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on February 15, 2017.

B. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status against the Plaintiff on the ground that it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff did not constitute a person with a sufficiently-founded fear that the Plaintiff might be subject to gambling.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 13, 2017, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the objection on October 11, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 4 (including various numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On March 2013, when the Plaintiff was in the second grade of a middle school in China, the Plaintiff was introduced into the Ma, and around November 2016, around 201, around 200 members of the Ma-gu Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma-dong Ma, and around September 2013, the Plaintiff reported that the motive for a middle school student was believed

Therefore, if the plaintiff returned to China, it is likely that the plaintiff will be stuffed in relation to the pathic activities of the Chinese government.

B. In order for a person to be recognized as a refugee, a person who entered Korea under the same stuff as arrest or detention of having been subject to punishment in China, and returned to China, has a well-founded fear of persecution by the Chinese government, or a person who has actively and leading activities related to patriarche while staying in Korea and returned to China, and has reached the attention of the Chinese government.