A, C, and D shall be punished by each fine of KRW 500,000,00,000, and each fine of KRW 700,000.

The defendants are the defendants.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B shared, from around 13:00 on June 11, 2015 to 18:18 on the same day, jointly 7 points out of the first floor of H housing in Ulsan-gu H from 13:51 on the same day, Defendant A and Defendant B used 51 on the first floor of H housing in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the first person who first pays 7 points, KRW 1,400, and KRW 200 when adding 1 points to the third person, together 120, namely, “high saw-saw”.

2. Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E shared with each other, using Chapter 51, from June 11, 2015 to 18:18 on the same day, at the place specified in paragraph 1, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E used Chapter 51, a person who first pays three points, and the person who first pays three points to that person, plus KRW 3 points, KRW 600, and KRW 200 when adding one point, 50, namely, a “high-saw saw.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement in court (the purport of recognizing factual relations)

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants: Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the Defendants and their defense counsel’ assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel asserts to the effect that the illegality of gambling acts in their holding is excluded because it is merely a temporary entertainment level.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the judgment, ① Defendant B, and E have gambling records, ② Defendant A stated in the investigative agency that the name of the other Defendants was completely gathered (as stated in the Investigation Record No. 51), Defendant B had first saw saws with other Defendants (as stated in the Investigation Record No. 63), and Defendant D had spawned, and Defendant D had spawned, so the name of the other Defendants, including Defendant A.