beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고합561

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years;

Seized evidence referred to in subparagraphs 6 through 12 shall be confiscated, respectively.

evidence of seizure.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On August 11, 1994, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Gwangju District Court for one year and six months, and on August 19, 204 at the Gwangju High Court for five years, respectively.

In addition, on March 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months at the Gwangju District Court on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and completed the execution of the sentence on July 21, 2013.

On November 10, 2013, from around 10:00 to 12:00, the Defendant opened a door and entered the door by inserting the dracker prepared in advance between the lock door and the lock guns, and inserting a tool specially produced in the cres that have occurred in the cres in the cres that occurred.

In addition, the Defendant committed theft with 1 point (No. 15), 1 point (No. 16), 1 point (No. 17), 1 point (No. 18), 2 points (No. 19, 20), and 4,147,00 won in total of market prices.

In addition, the Defendant habitually stolen the property amounting to KRW 11,53,00 in total from October 2013 to November 7, 2013, 11,553,00 through nine times (excluding No. 4,8) as stated in the annexed crime list, and attempted to steal the property on two occasions (No. 4,8).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each statement of G, C, E, H, and I;

1. Investigation report (No. 19 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Each protocol of seizure and expert report;

1. Each photograph (No. 13 and 15 No. 15) of the evidence list;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: An inquiry letter and a certificate of confinement;

1. Habituality: The Defendant has been punished for several times as a crime of larceny, etc., as stated in the first head of the judgment, and repeatedly commits the instant crime under several similar methods during the period of repeated crimes.