beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.22 2018고정772

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight hundred thousand won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 2017, at around 18:24 on the same day, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) discovered that the victim D, who had a good appraisal due to noise between his/her residence, resided in 602 dong 1404 and that of the victim D, who had a good appraisal due to the noise between ordinary stories, was able to look together with his/her family; (b) set up his/her bath to prevent the victim; and (c) leading him/her to the shoulder of the victim, who was punished by the Si expenses.

2. On January 9, 2018, from around 22:33 to around 22:34 on the same day, the Defendant, at a passage between 601 Dong and 602 Dong-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, that the injured party who did not have any appraisal for the same reason as the above paragraph “1,” reported that “I still have no director;

As a result, the victim’s right side macks together with his bath, such as “See ..”, and the victim continued to walk one time, and the victim who was trying to get on board the same apartment unit 602 elevator and continued to be on board the same apartment unit, obstructed the victim’s macks, and felling the chest part by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A report on investigation (an investigation into a victim D's assertion);

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. On July 18, 2017, at around 20:35 on the same day, the Defendant destroyed the charge by putting the victim’s residence at around 20:40 on the same day, and around the victim’s residence at 602 Dong-dong 1404, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, the Defendant destroyed the charge by having the victim walk the victim’s gate door by walking the victim’s gate for the same reason as that of the foregoing paragraph, with an estimate of approximately KRW 50,00 won.

2. Determination

A. Criminal facts shall be proved by a judge.