Defendant Counterclaim Plaintiff C, D, and Defendant F Co., Ltd. are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) for KRW 113,40,000.

A. Basic facts 1) Plaintiff A is the owner of a house 55 square meters and above ground, 2,664 square meters and above the K prior to K, a stable, and a vinyl. Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A. The Plaintiffs are growing crops in the above J’s house while residing three years in the above J’s house. Defendant C and D purchased the above J and K’s land on September 26, 2008 and completed the registration of transfer of ownership, and Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”).

) Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant E”)

(2) On November 12, 2009, Defendant C and D shared 1/2 shares with the land size of 2,963 square meters for L forest, M forest, 18 square meters for H forest and 60 square meters on November 12, 2009, following division of land, change of land category, partition of co-owned property, etc., Defendant C and D shared 1/2 shares. The land size of 6,279 square meters for I land was 6,279 square meters in the name of Defendant C, and the land for G land was 6,315 square meters in the name of Defendant D each ownership transfer was completed in the name of Defendant D.

(2) Defendant C and D set up the instant land to build solar power plants on July 25, 2009 and operated Defendant F, E, and Defendant C and D operate solar power plants on the instant land. The housing owned by the Plaintiff, the land C, the land owned by the Defendant C, the land owned by the Defendant C, the F, and E are as follows. Defendant C and D set up the instant land in order to build solar power plants at a higher height than the roof of the housing located by the Plaintiffs. The instant land and solar power plant on the instant land and solar power plant owned by the Plaintiff in the form of a third party.

Defendant C and D installed, around July 9, 2009, a U- U-type drainage channel after amnesty on the adjoining sloping part of the land owned by the said Defendants and the land owned by the Plaintiff A. However, U-type U-type pipe was invaded due to dysium, and there was a rupture in the front section of the Gu, due to bad discharge of drainage, and it was owned by the Plaintiff as the soil of the instant site was leaked around September 2010.