However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date of the final judgment.

On August 13, 2013, at around 21:30 on August 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that E, an employee of the above multi-user, who returned from approximately seven months ago, was not subject to his own telephone; and (b) made E’s clothes, which were located in the above multi-user, transferred to a single-use kitchen with a fire, which was located in the above multi-unit cremation and was located in advance; and (c) made it transferred to the whole of a multi-unit bank with a total floor area of about 19.8 square meters, which had been loaded in the above multi-unit cremation, via a diveter with a diveter with a fire, which was located in the above multi-unit cremation, and caused it to spread to a multi-unit bank with a total floor area of about 19.8 square meters.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the victim F, who was used as a residence by E, by putting a large amount of money equivalent to KRW 6,619,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (field investigation) and a report on investigation (limited to the attachment of fire-related materials to fire fighting units);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigations under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( considered as favorable circumstances deemed to be the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be repeated in favor of the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and six months from six months to fifteen years;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Determination of type, fire-prevention crime group, general standards, suspender buildings, etc.;

(b) Measures to mitigate special-sponsed persons (a self-denunciation or a person not subject to punishment);

(c) 9 months to 3 years ( mitigated areas) of imprisonment with prison labor within the scope of recommending punishment;

3. The act of fire-fighting in this case, which is a serious crime detrimental to public safety and peace, is a serious danger that is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, and his mistake is divided.