beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2019.05.17 2019고단124

사기

Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Basic Facts

Defendant

A is the director in charge of the "F Corporation" ordered by the victim E, and Defendant B is the director in charge of the public service team and the director in charge of managing the budget whole of the project as the vice-director in the dispute resolution council D, and Defendant C is the head in charge of the quality team, such as compiling and managing materials, etc. invested in the project as the director in charge of the dispute resolution council D and the director in charge of the dispute resolution council and the director in charge of the project.

The settlement of expenses for the supply of government-funded materials used for the above construction shall be made by preparing a "written confirmation of supply of government-funded materials" stating the quantity and amount of ready-mixed supplied by ready-mixed suppliers for a certain period of time, with the signature of the head of the D site management office, the head of the construction management division, and the final construction management officer, and submitting them to the victim E-accounting, the victim shall pay the price of supply at the price requested by the ready-mixed supplier.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A, Defendants A, B, and B had to bear the cost of KRW 29,54,096 due to the failure to obtain recognition of ready-mixed (336.8 cubic meters) invested in the “RCS Work” (25-30-150 cubic meters) in the construction process of installing the manufacturing site of the said construction project, and there was a conspiracy to obtain compensation from the victim by means of preparing a false supply confirmation, etc., as if all of the government-funded materials ready-mixeds (25-30-150 cubic meters) invested in the “RCS Work” (2,648.7 cubic meters), which would have been anticipated to have been originally spent (2,98.7 cubic meters). As such, Defendant A, B, and B had to bear the cost of excessive re-concing 29,54,096 cubic meterss (36.8 cubic meters meters).

Accordingly, in accordance with the direction of Defendant A, Defendant B, at the early December 2017, in the above site office of the construction site located in H in Dong-si, Dong-si, Dong-si, the amount of ready-mixed suppliers and the amount of ready-mixeds at the K-si, 3 location of the IB-si, and the K-si Construction Bank D.