(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From September 11, 2014, the above buildings are located.

A. On May 4, 2012, the Plaintiff leased the building indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building”) to the Defendant, with the lease deposit of KRW 20 million, KRW 700,000 per month, and the lease term from May 11, 2012 to May 10, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

On March 7, 2014, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a content-certified mail stating that “I, by May 10, 2014, inform the Defendant of the termination of the contract due to the expiration of the term of the lease agreement, I request the completion of the directors to order and order the directors by May 10, 2014.” The above content-certified mail reached the Defendant.

C. The Defendant paid all the rent to the Plaintiff by May 10, 2014, and paid 2.8 million won to the Plaintiff by September 10, 2014, and occupied and used the instant building.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the instant lease agreement was terminated upon the expiration of the period, on May 10, 2014, due to the expiration of May 10, 2014, by notifying the Defendant, a lessee, of the refusal to renew on March 7, 2014, the period between six months and one month before the expiration of the lease term.

I would like to say.

As to this, the defendant sent the content-certified mail sent by the plaintiff to the defendant's domicile and received it from his family, but he did not read it and was notified by the plaintiff, so the notification of the plaintiff's refusal to renew the lease contract of this case is null and void. However, the defendant's family received the content-certified mail sent to the defendant's domicile and received it from the defendant's family to reach

Since the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

In addition, although the defendant did not pay the difference, it is due to the plaintiff's consent.