However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

At around 05:10 on May 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) asked D D D shop operated by Pocheon C, and (b) asked D shop 606 transportation vehicles in the summer training to stop on the above road. On the 606 transportation vehicle, the Defendant used the 606 transportation vehicle in the summer training to walk the above E’s right bridge bucks, and then walked with E, and used the disturbance for about 40 minutes, such as walking a stone to E, stopping the vehicle moving on the above truck, and stopping the vehicle moving on the above truck. At the same time, the Defendant assaulted the public officials who perform legitimate duties concerning the training affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Each statement of F, G, H, I, J, K, and L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to injury diagnosis certificates and photographs;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] general injury to category I (General Bodily Injury) and basic area (4 months to one year and six months) (special mitigation) - mitigated person: Minor injury - Person under suspension of execution of official duties (decision of sentence] and person under suspension of execution of two years; and