Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment and the reasoning of the first instance judgment maintained by the lower court in light of the records, it is justifiable to maintain the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the grounds that there was no proof of crime, and to render a not guilty verdict on the ancillary charges added by the lower court on the grounds that there was no proof

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.