2. The judgment is based on the following facts: although the defendant deposited 18 million won for the victim, the defendant is recognized to have been punished for the same kind of crime including the suspension of execution, the extent of damage caused by the crime of this case is not less than 30 million won, such as the damage amount from the crime of this case to the 30 million won, the victim was unable to reach an agreement with the victim, the victim was shoting the defendant, and the court below seems to have determined the punishment by taking into account all favorable circumstances for the defendant, and there are no other circumstances that can be reduced by taking into account the sentencing newly established after the judgment of the court below, and considering various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is recognized to be appropriate. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.