2. In light of the favorable circumstances that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime, the Defendant had a record of criminal punishment several times, including the punishment imposed on the same kind of crime, and the fact that the Defendant did not recover from damage caused by the instant crime is considered as disadvantageous circumstances. In light of the above, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background, means and consequence leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that

There is no reason to view that the sentencing conditions have changed in the appellate court.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.