When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around January 10:17, 2020, the Defendant received a 112 report from Ansan-si B stating that the Defendant had no mental capacity to discern things or make decisions due to mental illness, such as a dysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysys

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Safy campaigns to be cut by police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Under Articles 10(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation [a person with mental disability] of the same Act (a person with mental disability] (a person with mental disability according to the records of this case, the defendant is recognized to have been hospitalized or provided medical treatment for a mental disease until now at a medical institution, such as Seoul National University Hospital Mental Health Department, etc. since the outbreak of a mental disorder, such as the damage network, etc., around 2016. The defendant is a doctor's opinion that he/she should be diagnosed as a dysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysysy

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The following circumstances are the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.