beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.08.13 2018고단365

상해등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 365"

1. On October 11, 2017, Defendant A demanded that the victim B take over a golf club on the first floor within the “J” located in JJ” located in JJ in Jincheon-gun I, J. However, as the victim did not put the key on the ground that it is illegal acquisition, Defendant A suffered injury to the victim, such as “damage to the fice’s character”, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B suffered injury, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, such as “heat that has no wife in the two parts of the victim,” in which the head of the victim was taken on a several occasions due to drinking, and the part of the victim’s head was taken one time due to an empty beer who was in danger of drinking, and the victim was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.”

Defendant A committed the following crimes, even though the victim D, who operated the said “J” golf driving range, did not pay the Defendant the amount equivalent to KRW 200,000,000 on behalf of the Defendant for the construction cost claim of KRW 200,000,000 on behalf of the former operator of the said golf driving range:

3. On December 12, 2015, Defendant A interfered with business operations, around December 12, 2015, loaded approximately two tons of soil on the “L”-owned dump truck operated by the Defendant in the said golf driving range, and stored on the road on the access side of the said golf driving range, and obstructed the victim’s operation of the golf driving range by force by making it difficult for customers and their vehicles to enter the golf driving range from February 15, 2016.

4. On or around August 12, 2017, Defendant A, on or around August 12, 2017, shall be a fish-tight floor where the victim, who was seated, is dissatisfied with the claim for construction cost, does not pay the construction cost.